No antimoder is more in rome? The new pope represents a new attitude towards the freedom of personal life, state clerics, homosexuality and women
Whether it is actually "unprecedented progressive thoughts" are the new pope franz in a now widespread interview, for example, to the sexual moral aubert, as always a question of the context.
You can imagine that the statements francis in the romische enclave ensures with their established power branches for coarse disturbance, because the pope is clearly against functional artery and state clerics and against theology in warm, crazy areas – against limits that accomplish into the room taken and kept clean and clean there at the clerical dogmin board.
What to take from his exercises is, above all, a new attitude. It differs significantly from the two processes, relies on openness and unfamiliar border guards. So franz dissociates itself from a formal, deduced specifications, which he clearly understands in several statements: "and i want it to give real, no formal consultations", "the church has sometimes noticed in small things, in small regulations." at the same time he marks a border that one has not heard so far from a church chief:
There must be no spiritual interference in the personal life.
The latter statement prompts the question of dealing with the church with homosexuality. The pope is not in a political election campaign, his answers are less striking, he refuses to ask questions that politicians are inclined to answer immediately with yes or no. When asked if he cheaply gives homosexuality, the head of the catholic church replies that he does not condemn and with the reference to the freedom of man.
That he on this question on one "perspective difference" attentive – the conviction of the church and their right to print them out, and their opposite the position of the personal freedom in which they do not have to interfere, testifies to a modern attitude. "You always have to look at the person." that also applies to divorces and abortions.
Pope francis. Image: agência brasil. License: creative commons license attribution 3.0 brazil
None of catechmism or theological dogmen deduced condemnation. Interesting is also in this context that franz in any of his sentences the word "obedience", central instrument of the centuries-long phobocracy of the church, released – if the term is downhound. If antifomestial currents that find a rough biotope in the church, relying on the two processes in the office, they were allowed to go to the background at pope francis, so the impression that arises in the interview.
How the new attitude of the boss will transfer to his next shepherds, cardinalae and bishopes, is the question. Immediately concrete changes, for example with the question of the role of women in the church, are not on. Francis wants to take the office of time. For example, in this ie, he introduces allegedly loud considerations, which, as with his processes, rubs with convictions that apply as essential maxims of modern saculative thinking:
The rooms of a cutting female prasence in the church must continue. But i fear in front of a "surity in the skirt", because the woman has a different structure than the man. The speeches that i hore about the role of the woman in the church, are often inspired by a man’s ideology.
Some were allowed to feel his answers to the role of the woman in the catholic church as evasive:
…You can function and was not confused. One must therefore deepen the idea of the woman in the church. You have to work more about a basic theology of the woman. Only if you go this way, you can better think about the function of the woman inside the church. The female genius is written in the places where important decisions are made. The challenge today is: reflect on the specific place of the woman especially where the church is exempted in the different areas of the church.